August 2nd, 2010
07:49 AM ET

Graham on 'unholy alliance'

A prominent Republican on the Senate Armed Services Committee is praising President Barack Obama's approach to fighting terrorism in Pakistan. However, Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-South Carolina, is also worried that conservatives and liberals could join forces to undermine Obama's efforts in Afghanistan.

Obama has set July 2011 as the target date to begin to draw down the additional troops he's surged into Afghanistan. But, in an interview broadcast Sunday on CNN's "State of the Union," Graham predicted that conditions may not allow the troops to begin to come home by that date.

"[G]enerally speaking, this time next summer, we're still going to be engaged in one hell of a fight," Graham said. "We're going to need every troop we have today, I think, still in Afghanistan next year."

According to Graham, it will be clear by the end of this year where things stand in Afghanistan.

"If, by December, we're not showing some progress, we're in trouble," he said. "And the question is: what is progress? Without some benchmarks and measurements, it's going to be hard to sell to the American people a continued involvement in Afghanistan."

Asked about the growing tide of sentiment against the Afghanistan war, particularly among Obama's base of supporters and some Democrats on Capitol Hill, Graham said he is worried about conservative and liberal forces joining together to frustrate Obama's efforts to stabilize Afghanistan.

"You know what I worry most about: an unholy alliance between the right and the left," Graham said. "That there are some Republicans who are not going to take a, you know, do-or-die attitude for Obama's war. There are some Republicans that want to make this Obama's war. . . There will be some Republicans saying you can't win because of the July 2011 withdrawal date, he's made it impossible for us to win, so why should we throw good money after bad?"

Graham added that liberals could also refuse to back the president's plans in Afghanistan.

"You've got people on the left who are mad with the president because he is doing exactly what [former President George W.] Bush did and we're in a war we can't win," Graham said, adding: "My concern is that, for different reasons, they join forces and we lose the ability to hold this thing together."

But, Graham said, he thinks the president understands the consequences of losing in Afghanistan.

"He's got a political problem. But we've got a national security problem," the Republican senator said.

Graham also said that the situations in Afghanistan and neighboring Pakistan are linked when it comes to national security.

"How do you win in Pakistan if you lose in Afghanistan?" Graham said. "And I asked the president that. How can we be successful in Pakistan, protect that regime from extremists, if all goes to hell in Afghanistan?"

While Graham expressed concern about the short and long-term situations in Afghanistan, he offered praise for what Obama is doing across the border in Pakistan.

"Things generally are the best they've been with Pakistan in a long time," Graham said. "And this is one area where President Obama doesn't get enough credit. His team, in my view, have brought out the Pakistanis into the fight better than anybody in recent memory. They're cooperating with us more."

Graham added: "So I would say that the Obama administration has done a very good job at taking the fight to the enemy in Pakistan and trying to bolster the Pakistanis' capability to take the fight to the enemy."

In addition to sitting on the Senate Armed Services Committee, Graham is also a member of the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee and the Veterans Affairs Committee.

Graham has served active duty in the military as an Air Force lawyer and continues to serve in the Air Force Reserves. He holds the rank of colonel and is assigned as an instructor at the Air Force Judge Advocate General School. Graham said he will be going to Afghanistan to do his reserve duty during the upcoming Senate recess in August.

More from CNN's Political Ticker

soundoff (15 Responses)
  1. Smith in Oregon

    In regards to America pulling it's troops and equipment out of Iraq, effectively ending that Bush Family 'Oil War'.

    In Vietnam, Millions of US Military weapons, explosives, aircraft, helicopters, artillery pieces and vehicles were left behind, literally abandoned. They were happily accepted by the North Vietnam forces. The American taxpayers then were put on the hook to replace 150% of the abandoned and used equipment with newer, upgraded and hyper-expensive replacements.

    I don't see any difference with the unfolding foobar in Iraq. The Pentagon and vast US Military Complex are already writing up gigantic funding requests to replace and upgrade more US Military weapons and equipment than even entered Iraq in the first place. Making this yet another gigantic giveaway of US Military hardware in modern history and this occurring during one of the worse recessions in America's entire history. This marks just another crass and callous attempt to HOSE the American taxpayers for every dime possible by the US Military Complex.

    Of course I'm happy America is finally pulling out of Iraq and 'that' Bush Family 'Oil War'.

    China got what Saddam had repeatedly refused to give them, the Iraqi Oil field leases. Iran got the biggest prize America could give them, Saddams head and part of Iraq's government to greatly expand their influence into Iraq.

    Thousands of American's gave their lives, even more gave their blood, sweat, tears and nearly 1 Trillion taxpayer dollars to Iraq. In return the depraved and utterly corrupt Bush-Cheney administration gave CHINA the multi-Trillion dollar Iraqi Oil field leases for mere pennys. The American people and taxpayers got HOSED.

    August 3, 2010 at 8:09 pm | Report abuse |
  2. bestglenn

    Graham is just another anti-US American Immoral Capitalist Republican. He is a disgrace at any level.
    Republican never ever forever again!

    August 3, 2010 at 8:01 am | Report abuse |
  3. Midwest guy

    So now it's a holy war? Please that is so last millennium. Even the great American empire cannot pull this off, due to the whole war(?) being undefined.

    August 2, 2010 at 10:13 pm | Report abuse |
  4. Stacey LaCour

    August 2nd, 2010 1:07 pm ET
    Your comment is awaiting moderation.
    I am only a Central Louisiana resident. No expert on any subject. I have not even been into the southern Gulf areas since the oil leak. I feel that this is what is referred to in the bible as God, turning the waters of the earth into blood. I am no religon expert, not even someone who goes around yelling to people to repent. But there are so many areas being affected, and now there is another oil leak in a lake in the northern US area. It is killing fish, and water life, plants, etc. If everyone will go into their bible and read what is to come, the things are stacking up. The fires in Russia, the continued move that Iran is making on the rest of us. The temprature rising all over the planet. Heat waves killing people, Wars in areas and rumors of wars. People, it is like buying health insurance before you get sick. Pray for us all, each other, and our earth and we are just purchasing insurance for our eternity.
    Please yall, start to pray, daily, hourly if you can remember to. It can only help. The non believers can pray, just to cover all bases. What can it hurt? And those of us who believe, we know the good that can come from it. The ladies from Garabandal, Spain, Medjughore, etc are bringing messages that tell us over and over to get right. To pray, to behave. Why not make an experiment out of it. Let's all just try to pray for each other and our government officials and see what happens

    August 2, 2010 at 1:23 pm | Report abuse |
  5. legs ortiz

    This tomfoolery of a senator is going to Afghanistan. That is one deployment I want to see happen and make sure he is subjected to the same situation so many of our sons & daughters are dealing with - I think Sen. Graham is a dinosaur from another century. A racist, a militarist and like I said – a dang fool when it comes to foreign policy and what national security really means for our country.

    August 2, 2010 at 12:00 pm | Report abuse |
  6. Riza Afghan

    He means only a few % of US Troops will go home and the rest will remain at least for 10 years more to bring stability in Afghanistan and shut down Pakistabi Talibans and their supporters Pakistan ISI !!!

    August 2, 2010 at 8:23 am | Report abuse |
    • BTDT

      Hopefully,he may fail !!!

      August 2, 2010 at 11:06 am | Report abuse |
      • Joseph McCarthy

        If he does,these right-wing thugs in Washington just may think twice before dragging us into their senseless wars!!!!

        August 2, 2010 at 11:09 am | Report abuse |
  7. Bledsoe

    Will somebody kindly tell me what Lindsay Graham is talking about?What "unholy"alliance except for the United States,Great Britain and France?I sure am clueless here.

    August 2, 2010 at 8:03 am | Report abuse |
    • Grimlock

      Republicans and Democrats, teaming up in opposition of the war in Afghanistan. Not your silly conspiracy theorys.

      August 2, 2010 at 3:04 pm | Report abuse |
      • Larry Valecia, Calif.US Army Forever...

        Republicans and Democrats in " Opposition" to this ungodly war???This I have to see!!!!

        August 2, 2010 at 7:57 pm | Report abuse |